For HIPAA implementation specifications that are addressable, which of the following statements is true?

For HIPAA implementation specifications that are classified as addressable, the correct statement is that the covered entity must conduct a risk assessment to determine whether the specification is appropriate to its environment. This means that when a specification is addressable, it does not require mandatory implementation; rather, the entity must evaluate the specific risks and circumstances of their operation.

This assessment allows the covered entity to make an informed decision about whether to implement the specification in a way that addresses identified risks to safeguard the security and privacy of health information. The flexibility inherent in addressable specifications is designed to help organizations tailor their compliance efforts based on their unique contexts, resources, and risk profiles.

In contrast, the other statements suggest either mandatory implementation or an exemption based on size, which does not align with the purpose of addressable specifications under HIPAA. Specifically, the addressable nature allows for discretion based on risk assessment rather than blanket implementation requirements or waivers based solely on an entity’s size.